As I was reading everything this evening, in my lovely, well
loved, and old reclining lazy boy chair mind you, I couldn’t help but feel like
this all had an air of familiarity to it. In reality I had just left quite a
few of these topics in one form or another less than two weeks ago. However
everything seemed to have a refreshing feel to it, like lemonade on a hot
summers day.
Much of my research
in 8730 revolved around how to get dialogue about students own artwork in a
critique or other setting. During that whole time I couldn’t help but feel like
it could have a VTS feel about what everything I was reading about but nothing would
ever flat out nail down the head completely. Then this wonderful statement
appeared before my eyes!
“Interpretations are not so much absolutely right, but more
or less reasonable, convincing, enlightening and informative.”
There it was not being tip toed around anymore it actually
gave all the frame work of VTS. A reasonable statement that was could be conceivable,
shine a light something someone else had missed, and provide information to
others. Working with the Boys Writers all last year they exhibited these types
of answers, most of the time, and even when they disagreed they were able to
see why it was said and where in no ways disrespectful.
As a side note: I still can't find the answer to the question Livek asked me about "the perfect question" in discussions. In many ways I am finding this to be a quest that halfway through these articles I thought would surely be answered..
I couldn’t help but also be highly draw to literally the
last section I read the work of Andres Serrano’s Immersion (Piss Christ). It does not help that he is one of my
favorite artist but the topic of how people think his work should be treated or
has always been almost maddingly intriguing. The responses that were gained
were ones I have typically heard, however what was a surprise was how
respectful the discussions were with differing views. I think this says a lot about
how to have meaningful dialog it has to be a respectful and safe environment
with a great facilitator in charge of the conversation.
Other bits that stuck
out and felt like they should be mentioned:
Students learn from observation.
-I wrote something like this in my artist statement/bio for
student teaching a few weeks ago as a quote that I believed in and felt was
important to write.
Students learn less just because that’s the way it is.
-I feel like this is something that I haven’t truly seen in some
ways yet because I feel like at times I have either been underestimating students
or literally not knowing what to expect. The thought of them learning less
might just be somewhat do to my own lack experience or because I literally don’t
know what to expect. Either way it feels hard to see them as learning less.
Maybe not something as quickly as we think, but not less.
Possible Questions:
Does anyone really feel like the really learn less? I can understand maybe not as fast as expected but learning less seems a bit odd in someways.
How can you deal with people where great offense is taken on an artwork. It seems like the best option is possibly to step away from everything and revist it under cooler times.
I felt the same way while reading lsat night. It was all familiar, yet new at the same time.
ReplyDeleteI don't think I have ever learned less, I was a little confused when this was brought up. Would anyone really want to think that that they learned less than what they expected? I wouldn't like that.